Types of Literature Review - Research-Methodology

 

literature review types

The main types of literature reviews are: evaluative, exploratory, and instrumental. [2] A fourth type, the systematic review, is often classified separately, but is essentially a literature review focused on a research question, trying to identify, appraise, select and synthesize all high-quality research evidence and arguments relevant to that question. Aug 20,  · Literature Review: Lit Review Types. Takes findings from several studies on the same subject and analyzes them using standardized statistical procedures Integrates findings from a large body of quantitative findings to enhance under-standing (study=unit of analysis)Author: Gerald Natal. Systematic literature review requires more rigorous and well-defined approach compared to most other types of literature review. Systematic literature review is comprehensive and details the timeframe within which the literature was selected. Systematic literature review can be divided into two categories: meta-analysis and meta-synthesis.


Start Here - How to Conduct a Literature Review - Research Guides at University of Alabama


Aims to demonstrate writer has extensively researched literature and critically evaluated its quality. Goes beyond mere description to include degree of analysis and conceptual innovation. Typically results in hypothesis or model. Seeks to identify significant items in the field. No formal quality assessment. Attempts to evaluate according to literature review types. Typically narrative, perhaps conceptual or chronological.

Significant component: seeks to identify conceptual contribution to embody existing or derive new theory. Generic term: published materials that provide examination of recent or current literature, literature review types. Can cover wide range of subjects at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness, literature review types. May include research findings. May or may not include comprehensive searching.

May or may not include quality assessment. Analysis may be chronological, conceptual, thematic, literature review types, etc. Characterizes quantity and quality of literature, perhaps by study design literature review types other key features.

May identify need for primary or secondary research. Technique that statistically combines the results of quantitative studies to provide a more precise effect of the results.

Aims for exhaustive searching. May use funnel plot to assess completeness. Graphical and tabular with narrative commentary.

Numerical analysis of measures of effect assuming absence of heterogeneity. Refers to any combination of methods where one significant component is a literature review usually systematic. Within a review context it refers to a combination of review approaches for example combining quantitative with qualitative research or outcome with process studies. Requires either very sensitive search to retrieve all studies or separately conceived quantitative and qualitative literature review types. Requires either a generic appraisal instrument or separate appraisal processes with corresponding checklists.

Typically both components will be presented as narrative and in tables. May also employ graphical means of integrating quantitative and qualitative studies.

Analysis may characterize both literatures and look for correlations between characteristics or use gap analysis to identify aspects absent in one literature but missing in the other.

Generic term: summary of the [medical] literature that attempts to survey the literature and describe its characteristics. May or may not include literature review types searching depends whether systematic overview or not. May or may not include quality assessment depends whether systematic overview or not.

Synthesis depends on whether systematic or not. Typically narrative but may include tabular features. Method literature review types integrating or comparing the findings from qualitative studies.

May employ selective or purposive sampling. Thematic analysis, may include conceptual models. Assessment of what is already known about a policy or practice issue, by using systematic review methods to search and critically appraise existing research. Completeness of searching determined by time constraints. Preliminary assessment of potential size and scope of available research literature.

Aims to identify nature and extent of research evidence usually including ongoing research. May include research in progress.

Typically tabular with some narrative commentary. Attempts to specify a viable review. Tend to address more literature review types matters in contrast to other combined retrospective and current literature review types. May offer new perspectives on issue or point out area for further research.

Aims for comprehensive searching of current literature. Typically narrative, may have tabular accompaniment. Current state of knowledge and priorities for future investigation and research. Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching. Typically literature review types with tabular accompaniment.

What is known; recommendations for practice. What remains unknown; uncertainty around findings, recommendations for future research. Systematic search and review. Combines strengths of critical review with a comprehensive search process. Minimal narrative, tabular summary of studies. Attempt literature review types include elements of systematic review process while stopping short of systematic review.

Typically conducted as postgraduate student assignment. What is known; uncertainty around findings; limitations of methodology. Specifically refers to review compiling evidence from multiple reviews into one accessible and usable document. Focuses on broad condition or problem for which there are competing interventions and highlights reviews that address these interventions and their results.

Identification of component reviews, but no search for primary studies. What remains unknown; recommendations for future research. Duke Health Badge: hour access. Clinical Tools for Duke Health. Contains Begins With Exact Match. Keywords Title Author Subject Heading. Systematic Reviews: the process: Types of Reviews.

A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. Label Description Search Appraisal Synthesis Analysis Critical review Aims to demonstrate writer has extensively researched literature and critically evaluated its quality.

Literature review Generic term: published materials that provide examination of recent or current literature, literature review types. Typically literature review types. May be graphical and tabular.

Meta-analysis Technique that statistically combines the results of quantitative studies to provide a more precise effect of the results. Overview Generic term: summary of the [medical] literature that attempts to survey the literature and describe its characteristics. Qualitative, narrative synthesis. Rapid review Assessment of what is already known about a policy or practice issue, by using systematic review methods to search and critically appraise existing research.

Time-limited formal quality assessment. Typically narrative and tabular. Scoping review Preliminary assessment of potential size and scope of available research literature. State-of-the-art review Tend to address more current matters in contrast to other combined retrospective and current approaches. Systematic search and review Combines strengths of critical review with a comprehensive search process. Systematized review Attempt to include elements of systematic review process while stopping short of systematic review.

Umbrella review Specifically refers to review compiling evidence from multiple reviews into one accessible and usable document. Critical review. Literature review. Rapid review, literature review types. Scoping review.

State-of-the-art review, literature review types. Systematic review. Systematized review. Umbrella review.

 

Literature review - Wikipedia

 

literature review types

 

The main types of literature reviews are: evaluative, exploratory, and instrumental. [2] A fourth type, the systematic review, is often classified separately, but is essentially a literature review focused on a research question, trying to identify, appraise, select and synthesize all high-quality research evidence and arguments relevant to that question. There are many different types of literature reviews, each with its own approach, analysis, and purpose. To confuse matters, these types aren't named consistently. The following are some of the more common types of literature reviews. Aug 05,  · Types of Literature Reviews. Integrative Review Considered a form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses.